Advertising Continue reading below On top of that, we need to be on top of the usual stuff and more importantly the basics (still in progress) such as technology, structured data, platforms, user experience, design and the contents. I'm not as optimistic about Phone voice search as many of my SEO friends. It's not as advanced as needed (my mother tongue is spoken by 320,000 people) and, more importantly, not as integrated into our daily lives as it should be. Voice search will be a thing, but not in 2017. Mobile is no longer a trend. It is obligatory. But mobile could break many companies that don't keep up. I'm not sure AMP is the thing, but it's definitely the first step towards what's to come.
Bottom line: We're still on the fax list move, we're more connected than ever, and things are likely to change quickly. Jim Hedger, Creative Partner, Digital Always Media Jim Hedger British historian James Burke has suggested that certain events or outcomes of events that happened at or around Phone the same time individually or collectively changed our understanding of ourselves and the universe around us. Not only did he open up the world of history to a generation of thinkers, but Phone coffee-table-sized books out of concept. Fundamentally, since we only perceive what we know how to perceive, our fundamental understanding of the universe is tied to the things we know.
When we discover or prove something beyond what we knew we know, or when a confluence of things combine to create something wonderfully new, our perception of the universe around us must be altered. Advertising Continue reading below This is what 2016 was all about. And the change of the universe should only accelerate in 2017. Does anyone remember exactly when IBM built a computer so powerful that it was able to score an indisputable victory against the best chess player in the world? Many will Phone think of Deep Blue against Garry Kasparov in February 1996, but it wasn't until December 2006 that Deep Blue protege Deep Fritz defeated world grandmaster Vladimir Kramnik, a machine would have completely defeated a human brain.